A difference of six orders of magnitude: A reply to "The magnitude of the fragmentation rate coefficient"

Aileen R. Wang, Shiping Zhu*, Yungwan Kwak, Atsushi Goto, Takeshi Fukuda, Michael S. Monteiro

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

155 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been an ongoing debate regarding the mechanism that causes rate retardation phenomena observed in some reversible addition-fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization systems. Some attribute the retardation to slow fragmentation of adduct radicals, others attribute it to fast fragmentation coupled with cross-termination between propagating and adduct radicals. There exists a difference of six orders of magnitude (10-2 versus 104/s) in the reported values of the fragmentation rate constant (kf0) for virtually similar RAFT systems of PSt-S-C · (Ph)-S-PSt. In this communication, we explain the estimates of kf ∼ 104/s and the choices of the rate constant in modeling based on experimental polymerization rate and radical concentration data. The use of kf ∼ 10-2/s in the model results in a calculated adduct radical concentration level of 10-4 to 10-3 mol/L, which appears to directly contradict the reported electron spin resonance (ESR) data in the range of <10-6 mol/L. We hope that this open discussion can stimulate more effort to resolve this outstanding difference.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2833-2839
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry
Volume41
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 15 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Materials Chemistry

Keywords

  • Controlled living radical polymerization
  • Kinetic rate constant
  • Modeling
  • Polymerization mechanism
  • Reversible addition-fragmentation transfer polymerization (RAFT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A difference of six orders of magnitude: A reply to "The magnitude of the fragmentation rate coefficient"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this