Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other

Douglas M. McLeod*, Benjamin H. Detenber, William P. Eveland

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

162 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated factors related to two types of judgments that make up the third-person perception: media effects on others and effects on self. Specifically, separate regression path models revealed that estimates of effects on others are based on a relatively naive schema for media effects that is similar to the "magic bullet" model of media effects (i.e., more exposure leads to greater effects). On the other hand, assessing effects on self involves a more complex, conditional effects model. The different pattern of results for the self and other models reflect the "fundamental attribution error" from attribution theory. The path models also extend results from the perceptual component to the behavioral component of the third-person effect by linking the explanatory variables to support for censorship. Both models showed that paternalistic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for censorship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)678-695
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this