Circuit-level reliability requirements for Cu metallization

Syed M. Alam*, Chee Lip Gan, Frank L. Wei, Carl V. Thompson, Donald E. Troxel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Under similar test conditions, the electromigration reliability of Al and Cu interconnect trees demonstrate significant differences because of differences in interconnect architectural schemes. The low critical stress for void nucleation at the Cu and interlevel diffusion-barrier interface leads to varying failure characteristics depending on the via position and configuration in a line. Unlike Al technology, a (jL) product-filtering algorithm with a classification of separate via-above and via-below treatments is required for Cu interconnect trees. A methodology and tool for circuit-level interconnect-reliability analyses has been developed. Using data from the literature, the layout-specific circuitlevel reliability for Al and dual-damascene Cu metallizations have been compared for various circuits and circuit elements. Significantly improved test-level reliability in Cu is required to achieve equivalent circuit-level reliability. Moreover, the required improvement will increase as low-k/low-modulus dielectrics are introduced, and as liner thicknesses are reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-530
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Keywords

  • Aluminum interconnects
  • Barrierless via
  • Circuit-level reliability simulation
  • Copper interconnects
  • Electromigration
  • Integrated-circuit (IC) reliability
  • Reliability estimation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Circuit-level reliability requirements for Cu metallization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this