TY - JOUR
T1 - Compaction as a cost-effective strategy to upgrade the disposal of MSWI fly ash
T2 - feasibility and potential
AU - Dai, Shijin
AU - Xia, Fafa
AU - Yang, Bo
AU - Wu, Deli
AU - Niu, Dongjie
AU - Zhao, Youcai
AU - Fei, Xunchang
AU - Cheng, Zhanbo
AU - He, Hongping
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Higher Education Press 2025.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Landfilling remains the primary disposal method for fly ash produced from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) following stabilization/solidification. However, the increasing generation of stabilized fly ash (SFA) is accelerating the depletion of landfill capacity. Furthermore, the small particle size and low bulk density of SFA present significant environmental risks during handling and transportation. To mitigate these issues, a cost-effective compaction method was introduced into the SFA disposal process. The results show that SFA from both grate furnaces and fluidized bed incinerators exhibited high porosity, loose structure, and irregular particle morphology, indicating substantial potential for compaction. Key parameters influencing compaction effectiveness included compaction pressure, holding duration, and moisture content, with optimal values identified as 100–200 MPa, 20 s, and 10%–15% moisture, respectively, depending on the incinerator type. After compaction treatment, the density of SFA more than doubled, while its volume was reduced by over 60%, significantly increasing landfill capacity and enhancing the efficiency of SFA disposal. The compaction process was effectively modeled using the Huang Peiyun equation for gerate furnace ash and the Heckel equation for fluidized bed ash. Furthermore, the unconfined compressive strength and three-point bending strength of compacted SFA met the MU10 standard for lime-sand bricks, making the material suitable for transportation and disposal. Finally, the compaction-based disposal method for SFA demonstrated clear techno-economic advantages and significant potential for broader application in waste management strategies. (Figure presented.)
AB - Landfilling remains the primary disposal method for fly ash produced from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) following stabilization/solidification. However, the increasing generation of stabilized fly ash (SFA) is accelerating the depletion of landfill capacity. Furthermore, the small particle size and low bulk density of SFA present significant environmental risks during handling and transportation. To mitigate these issues, a cost-effective compaction method was introduced into the SFA disposal process. The results show that SFA from both grate furnaces and fluidized bed incinerators exhibited high porosity, loose structure, and irregular particle morphology, indicating substantial potential for compaction. Key parameters influencing compaction effectiveness included compaction pressure, holding duration, and moisture content, with optimal values identified as 100–200 MPa, 20 s, and 10%–15% moisture, respectively, depending on the incinerator type. After compaction treatment, the density of SFA more than doubled, while its volume was reduced by over 60%, significantly increasing landfill capacity and enhancing the efficiency of SFA disposal. The compaction process was effectively modeled using the Huang Peiyun equation for gerate furnace ash and the Heckel equation for fluidized bed ash. Furthermore, the unconfined compressive strength and three-point bending strength of compacted SFA met the MU10 standard for lime-sand bricks, making the material suitable for transportation and disposal. Finally, the compaction-based disposal method for SFA demonstrated clear techno-economic advantages and significant potential for broader application in waste management strategies. (Figure presented.)
KW - Compaction process
KW - Disposal upgrading
KW - Stabilized fly ash
KW - Volume reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213985683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85213985683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11783-025-1955-1
DO - 10.1007/s11783-025-1955-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213985683
SN - 2095-2201
VL - 19
JO - Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering
JF - Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering
IS - 3
M1 - 35
ER -