Comparison of machine learning approaches for structure–function modeling in glaucoma

To evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches for structure–function modeling to estimate visual field (VF) loss in glaucoma, models from different ML approaches were trained on optical coherence tomography thickness measurements to estimate global VF mean deviation (VF MD) and focal VF loss from 24-2 standard automated perimetry. The models were compared using mean absolute errors (MAEs). Baseline MAEs were obtained from the VF values and their means. Data of 832 eyes from 569 participants were included, with 537 Asian eyes for training, and 148 Asian and 111 Caucasian eyes set aside as the respective test sets. All ML models performed significantly better than baseline. Gradient-boosted trees (XGB) achieved the lowest MAE of 3.01 (95% CI: 2.57, 3.48) dB and 3.04 (95% CI: 2.59, 3.99) dB for VF MD estimation in the Asian and Caucasian test sets, although difference between models was not significant. In focal VF estimation, XGB achieved median MAEs of 4.44 [IQR 3.45–5.17] dB and 3.87 [IQR 3.64–4.22] dB across the 24-2 VF for the Asian and Caucasian test sets and was comparable to VF estimates from support vector regression (SVR) models. VF estimates from both XGB and SVR were significantly better than the other models. These results show that XGB and SVR could potentially be used for both global and focal structure–function modeling in glaucoma.