Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample

Aakrosh Ratan, Webb Miller, Joseph Guillory, Jeremy Stinson, Somasekar Seshagiri, Stephan C. Schuster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their ability to identify single nucleotide substitutions in whole genome sequences from the same human sample. We report on significant GC-related bias observed in the data sequenced on Illumina and SOLiD platforms. The differences in the variant calls were investigated with regards to coverage, and sequencing error. Some of the variants called by only one or two of the platforms were experimentally tested using mass spectrometry; a method that is independent of DNA sequencing. We establish several causes why variants remained unreported, specific to each platform. We report the indel called using the three sequencing technologies and from the obtained results we conclude that sequencing human genomes with more than a single platform and multiple libraries is beneficial when high level of accuracy is required.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere55089
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 6 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this