Abstract
This study answers two research questions regarding framing theory. First, what happens when frames are challenged? Second, how resistant are the opinions that initial frames induce? 1,006 participants completed an online experiment where they were randomly assigned to first view a blog post with either complementary or competitive framing on driverless cars. Participants also viewed a blog post that challenged the stance of the first blog post. Results revealed that complementary frames polarized opinions, while competitive frames neutralized framing effects. Competitive frames induced more resistant opinions than complementary frames did. Attitude and support were susceptible to new, antagonistic information. This study concludes that framing effects are ephemeral and easily challenged by different information.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 512-531 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | International Journal of Public Opinion Research |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars: Framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Safety concerns determine level of public support for driverless vehicles, finds NTU study
3/18/21
3 items of Media coverage
Press/Media: Research