Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars: Framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance?

Shirley S. Ho*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study answers two research questions regarding framing theory. First, what happens when frames are challenged? Second, how resistant are the opinions that initial frames induce? 1,006 participants completed an online experiment where they were randomly assigned to first view a blog post with either complementary or competitive framing on driverless cars. Participants also viewed a blog post that challenged the stance of the first blog post. Results revealed that complementary frames polarized opinions, while competitive frames neutralized framing effects. Competitive frames induced more resistant opinions than complementary frames did. Attitude and support were susceptible to new, antagonistic information. This study concludes that framing effects are ephemeral and easily challenged by different information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)512-531
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars: Framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this