TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Tham et al. Recovery of Protein from Dairy Milk Waste Product Using Alcohol-Salt Liquid Biphasic Flotation. Processes 2019, 7, 875 (Processes, (2020), 8, 4, (381), 10.3390/pr8040381)
AU - Tham, Pei En
AU - Ng, Yan Jer
AU - Sankaran, Revathy
AU - Khoo, Kuan Shiong
AU - Chew, Kit Wayne
AU - Yap, Yee Jiun
AU - Malahubban, Masnindah
AU - Aziz Zakry, Fitri Abdul
AU - Show, Pau Loke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Following publication, concerns were raised to the editorial office relating to a potential conflict of interest between an author and the Academic Editor who supervised the peer-review of this article. Adhering to our complaints policy, an investigation was completed by the Editorial Office, which confirmed a recent collaboration between an author and the Academic Editor that could be perceived as a conflict of interest and was judged to not align with MDPI’s conflict of interest policy relating to the handling of Special Issue submissions (https://www.mdpi.com/special_issues_guidelines). Consequently, the Editorial office and Editorial Board conducted a post-publication review of this research article [1] and its correction [2]. This included inviting an Editorial Board member to review whether the entire editorial process had been carried out as per standard MDPI policy (https://www.mdpi.com/editorial_process), assessing the quality of the peer-review and considering the appropriateness of the final decision made on this publication. Here the Editorial Board member confirmed all elements of the editorial process and concluded that the acceptance and publication of this publication [1] and its correction [2]. As a result, of this process, the Editorial Office, Editorial Board, and the authors agreed to replace the existing Academic Editor listed on this publication with that of the Editorial Board member who conducted this post-publication review. The original publication has now been updated accordingly.
AB - Following publication, concerns were raised to the editorial office relating to a potential conflict of interest between an author and the Academic Editor who supervised the peer-review of this article. Adhering to our complaints policy, an investigation was completed by the Editorial Office, which confirmed a recent collaboration between an author and the Academic Editor that could be perceived as a conflict of interest and was judged to not align with MDPI’s conflict of interest policy relating to the handling of Special Issue submissions (https://www.mdpi.com/special_issues_guidelines). Consequently, the Editorial office and Editorial Board conducted a post-publication review of this research article [1] and its correction [2]. This included inviting an Editorial Board member to review whether the entire editorial process had been carried out as per standard MDPI policy (https://www.mdpi.com/editorial_process), assessing the quality of the peer-review and considering the appropriateness of the final decision made on this publication. Here the Editorial Board member confirmed all elements of the editorial process and concluded that the acceptance and publication of this publication [1] and its correction [2]. As a result, of this process, the Editorial Office, Editorial Board, and the authors agreed to replace the existing Academic Editor listed on this publication with that of the Editorial Board member who conducted this post-publication review. The original publication has now been updated accordingly.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001109771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001109771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/pr13030820
DO - 10.3390/pr13030820
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:105001109771
SN - 2227-9717
VL - 13
JO - Processes
JF - Processes
IS - 3
M1 - 820
ER -