Does being a jerk work? Examining the effect of aggressive risk communication in the context of science blogs

Shupei Yuan, John C. Besley*, Chen Lou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding aggressive risk communication is important because many scientists use this approach and we know little about its effects. Two studies were conducted to assess the effect of exposure to aggressive risk communication by a scientist on respondents’ perceptions of risk communication quality, supportive behavior (i.e. forwarding the communication), risk communicator likability, and overall views about scientists. Perceived aggressiveness (studies 1–2) and expectation violation (study 2) were considered as mediators. Analyses suggest both direct and indirect negative effects of aggressive risk communication in the case of likability but potentially positive effects in terms of evaluating the message quality. Moreover, expectation violation provided one possible explanation for the effect of aggression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-520
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 3 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • General Social Sciences
  • General Engineering
  • Strategy and Management

Keywords

  • aggressiveness
  • expectation violation
  • incivility
  • risk communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does being a jerk work? Examining the effect of aggressive risk communication in the context of science blogs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this