Efficacy Beliefs in Third-Person Effects

Sonny Rosenthal*, Benjamin Hill Detenber, Hernando Rojas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggests that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-576
Number of pages23
JournalCommunication Research
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • censorship
  • efficacy
  • self-regulation
  • sexual content
  • third-person effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy Beliefs in Third-Person Effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this