TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER)
AU - Ho, Khek Yu
AU - Phee, Soo Jay
AU - Shabbir, Asim
AU - Low, Soon Chiang
AU - Huynh, Van An
AU - Kencana, Andy Prima
AU - Yang, Kai
AU - Lomanto, Davide
AU - So, Bok Yan Jimmy
AU - Wong, Y. Y.Jennie
AU - Chung, S. C.Sydney
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - Background: Performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using standard endoscopy platforms is technically challenging because of the equipment's lack of dexterity. Objective: To explore the feasibility of using the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), a novel robotics-enhanced endosurgical system, to perform ESD. Design: ESD was performed on simulated gastric lesions in 5 Erlangen porcine stomach models (ex vivo) and 5 live pigs (in vivo). Performance of ESD by using the MASTER was compared with that using the insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knife. Setting: SMART Laboratory, Advance Surgical Training Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. Subjects: Five Erlangen porcine stomach models and 5 pigs, 5 to 7 months old, each weighing about 35 kg. Interventions: ESD. Main Outcome Measurements: Lesion resection time, grasper and hook efficacy grade, completeness of resection, and presence of procedure-related perforation. Results: In the Erlangen stomach models, 15 simulated lesions from the cardia, antrum, and body were removed en bloc (mean dimension, 37.4 × 26.5 mm) by electrocautery excision using the MASTER. The mean ESD time was 23.9 minutes (range 7-48 minutes). There was no difference in the dissection times of lesions at different locations (P = .449). In the live pigs, the MASTER took a mean of 16.2 minutes (range 3-29 minutes) to complete the ESD of 5 gastric lesions, whereas the IT diathermic knife took 18.6 minutes (range 9-34 minutes). There was no significant difference in the times taken (P = .708). All lesions were excised en bloc; the mean dimensions of lesions resected by the MASTER and the IT diathermic knife were 37.2 × 30.1 mm and 32.78 × 25.6 mm, respectively. The MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency throughout. Surgical maneuvers were achieved with ease and precision. There was no incidence of excessive bleeding or stomach wall perforation. Limitations: Exploratory study with limited sample size. Conclusions: Performing ESD by using the MASTER is feasible.
AB - Background: Performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using standard endoscopy platforms is technically challenging because of the equipment's lack of dexterity. Objective: To explore the feasibility of using the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), a novel robotics-enhanced endosurgical system, to perform ESD. Design: ESD was performed on simulated gastric lesions in 5 Erlangen porcine stomach models (ex vivo) and 5 live pigs (in vivo). Performance of ESD by using the MASTER was compared with that using the insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knife. Setting: SMART Laboratory, Advance Surgical Training Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. Subjects: Five Erlangen porcine stomach models and 5 pigs, 5 to 7 months old, each weighing about 35 kg. Interventions: ESD. Main Outcome Measurements: Lesion resection time, grasper and hook efficacy grade, completeness of resection, and presence of procedure-related perforation. Results: In the Erlangen stomach models, 15 simulated lesions from the cardia, antrum, and body were removed en bloc (mean dimension, 37.4 × 26.5 mm) by electrocautery excision using the MASTER. The mean ESD time was 23.9 minutes (range 7-48 minutes). There was no difference in the dissection times of lesions at different locations (P = .449). In the live pigs, the MASTER took a mean of 16.2 minutes (range 3-29 minutes) to complete the ESD of 5 gastric lesions, whereas the IT diathermic knife took 18.6 minutes (range 9-34 minutes). There was no significant difference in the times taken (P = .708). All lesions were excised en bloc; the mean dimensions of lesions resected by the MASTER and the IT diathermic knife were 37.2 × 30.1 mm and 32.78 × 25.6 mm, respectively. The MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency throughout. Surgical maneuvers were achieved with ease and precision. There was no incidence of excessive bleeding or stomach wall perforation. Limitations: Exploratory study with limited sample size. Conclusions: Performing ESD by using the MASTER is feasible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956242249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956242249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 20646698
AN - SCOPUS:77956242249
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 72
SP - 593
EP - 599
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 3
ER -