Evaluation of two vacuum preloading techniques using model tests

B. Li*, S. F. Wu, J. Chu, K. P. Lam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several vacuum preloading systems have been developed over the years. Each has its advantages and limitations. Two vacuum preloading techniques, namely the Menard and the Beaudrain systems, have been evaluated using model tests. Comparison between using two different drain types, circular and band drain has also been conducted. The test results are presented in this paper. The model tests show that the Menard preloading system is more effective under the test conditions; on the other hand, not much difference is observed between the consolidation results of the circular and band drain. The implication of the model tests to large scale field conditions is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGeo-Frontiers 2011
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference
Pages636-645
Number of pages10
Edition211 GSP
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
EventGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Dallas, TX, United States
Duration: Mar 13 2011Mar 16 2011

Publication series

NameGeotechnical Special Publication
Number211 GSP
ISSN (Print)0895-0563

Conference

ConferenceGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityDallas, TX
Period3/13/113/16/11

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Keywords

  • Drainage
  • Model tests
  • Preloading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of two vacuum preloading techniques using model tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this