Abstract
While unprecedented amounts of building damage data are now produced after earthquakes, stakeholders do not have a systematic method to synthesize and evaluate damage information, thus leaving many datasets unused. We propose a Geospatial Data Integration Framework (G-DIF) that employs regression kriging to combine a sparse sample of accurate field surveys with spatially exhaustive, though uncertain, damage data from forecasts or remote sensing. The framework can be implemented after an earthquake to produce a spatially distributed estimate of damage and, importantly, its uncertainty. An example application with real data collected after the 2015 Nepal earthquake illustrates how regression kriging can combine a diversity of datasets—and downweight uninformative sources—reflecting its ability to accommodate context-specific variations in data type and quality. Through a sensitivity analysis on the number of field surveys, we demonstrate that with only a few surveys, this method can provide more accurate results than a standard engineering forecast.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1695-1718 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Earthquake Spectra |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2020.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
- Geophysics
Keywords
- damage map
- data fusion
- geostatistics
- Post-earthquake damage
- rapid loss model
- remote sensing