Abstract
Purpose - While communication technologies become more innovative and Internet grows, the need to review the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum is clearly evident. The purpose of this article is based, then, on research done on globalization and democracy (Chua, 2003), on "trilemmas" of global integration (Rodrik, 2000) and on the logic of collective action (Olson, 1971). Methodology/approach/design - The authors use arguments based on economics, political science and communication theory in order to answer the following question: to what extent is it possible to put into practice a policy for Internet governance? Findings - They conclude, firstly, that States should stick to "thin" globalization of the Internet or choose between sovereignty and democracy. Practical implications - Secondly, they also conclude that the United States, which continues to dominate the Internet, must remain engaged and involved in Internet governance.
Translated title of the contribution | Globalization of the internet, sovereignty or democracy: The trilemma of the internet governance forum |
---|---|
Original language | Portuguese |
Pages (from-to) | 45-62 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Law
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Keywords
- Collective action
- Global integration
- Globalization
- IGF
- Internet governance