High-aperture diffraction of a scalar, off-axis Gaussian beam

Paul John Cronin*, Peter Torok, Peter Varga, Carol Cogswell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A scalar treatment for Gaussian beams offset from the optic axis and then focused by a high-numerical-aperture lens is presented. Such a theory is required for describing certain types of Doppler microscopes, i.e., when the measurement is simultaneously performed by more than a single beam axially offset and then focused by a lens. Analytic expressions for the intensity in the focal region of the high-aperture lens are derived. From these expressions we calculate the intensity in the focal region with parameters of beam size, beam offset, and the numerical aperture of the lens. The relative location and variation of the intensity around the focal region are discussed in detail. We show that for small-diameter Gaussian beams the Strehl ratio increases above unity as the beam is offset from the optic axis. This is explained by the increase in the effective numerical aperture of the offset beam compared with the one collinear with the optic axis. From examining the focal distribution, we conclude that it rotates for small beam size and that increasing beam diameter causes the focused distribution to rotate and shear, i.e., to distort. We also show that the distortion of the distribution increases with increasing numerical aperture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1556-1564
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-aperture diffraction of a scalar, off-axis Gaussian beam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this