Image motion and context: A between- and within-subjects comparison

Robert F. Simons*, Benjamin H. Detenber, Jason E. Reiss, Christopher W. Shults

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two previous experiments, we studied how stimulus motion affects both the self-report of emotion experience and the physiological sequelae of emotion. In both studies, image motion intensified emotional responding, and the effect of motion was relatively specific to the arousal dimension of the emotion; there was little evidence that image motion altered the valence of the image. Moving images also appeared to sustain the attention of the participants for a longer period of time than did the still images. In these two experiments, however, image motion was manipulated within participants. In the present experiment, we used a between-subjects manipulation of image motion and found a nearly identical pattern of results. These data indicate that motion inherently increments the arousal value of an image and that this increment is not dependent on the context in which motion is introduced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-710
Number of pages5
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biological Psychiatry

Keywords

  • Arousal
  • Emotion
  • Media
  • Motion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Image motion and context: A between- and within-subjects comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this