Imposing Advice on Powerful People

Lyn M. Van Swol*, Andrew Prahl, Erina MacGeorge, Sara Branch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines how advice recipients’ feelings of power and the solicitation of advice affects the perception of advice. Participants were primed for low or high power, wrote about a personal problem, and shared it online to a peer. The peer was a confederate who gave advice. Advice was either permitted (participant was asked if they wanted advice and said yes), guaranteed (participant was given advice without asking if wanted), or imposed (participant said they did not want advice, but advice was given). Participants had lower utilization intentions and positive emotions for imposed advice than permitted or guaranteed advice. High power participants had lower intentions than low power participants to use imposed advice, especially when disclosing a more personal problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-187
Number of pages15
JournalCommunication Reports
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Western States Communication Association.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Education
  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • Advice
  • Decision-Making
  • Power
  • Unsolicited Advice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imposing Advice on Powerful People'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this