Investigating model performance in language identification: beyond simple error statistics

Language development experts need tools that can automatically identify languages from fluent, conversational speech and provide reliable estimates of usage rates at the level of an individual recording. However, LID systems are typically evaluated on metrics such as equal error rate and balanced accuracy, applied at the level of an entire speech corpus. These overview metrics do not provide information about model performance at the level of individual speakers, recordings, or units of speech with different linguistic characteristics. Overview statistics may mask systematic errors in model performance for some subsets of the data, and consequently, have worse performance on data derived from some subsets of human speakers, creating a kind of algorithmic bias. Here, we investigate how well a number of LID systems perform on individual recordings and speech units with different linguistic properties in the MERLIon CCS Challenge featuring accented code-switched child-directed speech.