Journalists Primed: How Professional Identity Affects Moral Decision Making

Patrick Ferrucci*, Edson C. Tandoc, Erin E. Schauster

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines whether professional journalists reason differently about moral problems when primed with their professional identity. This between-subjects experiment (N = 171) used the Defining Issues Test, a much-used and validated instrument that measures moral reasoning. The results show identity priming does not affect how journalists apply ethics. The study also found that journalists score far lower in moral reasoning than they did 13 years ago. These results are interpreted through the lens of social identity theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-912
Number of pages17
JournalJournalism Practice
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication

Keywords

  • ethics
  • experiment
  • identity
  • Journalism
  • moral development
  • priming

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Journalists Primed: How Professional Identity Affects Moral Decision Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this