Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material

Bart M. Wiarda*, Karin Horsthuis, Annette C. Dobben, Remy W.F. Geenen, Martin A. Heitbrink, Willem Moolenaar, Ernst J. Kuipers, Jaap Stoker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations. Conclusion: The use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-273
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Keywords

  • Enteroclysis
  • Gastrointestinal radiology
  • Inflammatory small bowel disease
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Small bowel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this