Modeling Downward Counterfactual Events: Unrealized Disasters and why they Matter

Yolanda C. Lin*, Susanna F. Jenkins, Jun Rui Chow, Sébastien Biass, Gordon Woo, David Lallemant

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disaster risk research’s reliance on past events has proved inadequate when it comes to extreme events. This shortcoming stems from limited records (for example, due to the vast differences in timescales between geological processes and human records) and the dynamic nature of all three components of risk–drivers of change in hazard (e.g., climate change), exposure (e.g., urban growth), and vulnerability (e.g., aging infrastructure). This paper provides a framework for modeling key unrealized events through downward counterfactual changes for consideration in future risk modeling and assessment. Past disasters are typically viewed as fixed events, and the resulting lessons-learned are inherently limited by this definition; downward counterfactual thought provides a means to harvest additional insights and capture a larger consequence space. As such, we have identified a need for a guiding framework in order to incorporate downward counterfactual thought in the context of disaster risk modeling applied to both natural and anthropogenic hazards. The downward counterfactual framework relies first on identifying a past event, which may or may not have been considered a major disaster. After an event has been identified, historical parameters from the past event are relaxed in order to identify small changes that result in downward, worsening consequences. This can be continued for multiple changes until an end-of-search criteria is reached. The framework is especially relevant for regions that may have a sparse past catalog, either due to limited data or limited occurrences of natural hazards. As such, the framework is demonstrated in the context of Singapore, a city-nation that has historically had limited recorded natural hazards events, through five case studies on past anthropogenic, environmental, seismic, volcanic, and storm hazard events. This framework can help harness lessons-learned from unrealized disasters to support a more resilient future through informed policies and plans.

Original languageEnglish
Article number575048
JournalFrontiers in Earth Science
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 6 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Lin, Jenkins, Chow, Biass, Woo and Lallemant.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Keywords

  • counterfactual thought experiments
  • horizon scanning
  • risk framework
  • scenario development
  • sensitivity analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling Downward Counterfactual Events: Unrealized Disasters and why they Matter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this