Abstract
Flooding is the most frequent and damaging natural hazard globally. While nature-based solutions can reduce flood risk, they are not part of mainstream risk management. We develop a probabilistic risk analysis framework to quantify these benefits that (1) accounts for frequent small events and rarer large events, (2) can be applied to large basins and data-scarce contexts, and (3) quantifies economic benefits and reduction in people affected. Measuring benefits in terms of avoided losses enables the integration of nature-based solutions in standard cost-benefit analysis of protective infrastructure. Results for the Chindwin River basin in Myanmar highlight the potential consequences of deforestation on long-term flood risk. We find that loss reduction is driven by small but frequent storms, suggesting that current practice relying on large storms may underestimate the benefits of nature-based solutions. By providing average annual losses, the framework helps mainstream nature-based solutions in infrastructure planning or insurance practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1310-1321 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | One Earth |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 17 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Authors
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Environmental Science
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Keywords
- deforestation
- ecosystems services
- environmental change
- flood risk mitigation
- flooding
- green infrastructure
- Myanmar
- natural infrastructure
- nature-based solutions
- risk reduction