Abstract
Operations management (OM) researchers have traditionally focused on developing normative mathematical models that prescribe what managers and firms should do. Recently, there has been increased interest in understanding what managers and firms actually do and the factors that drive these decisions. To advance this understanding, empirical investigation using causal inference models is critical. However, in many contexts, the ability to obtain causal inferences is fraught with the challenges of endogeneity and selection bias. This paper describes five empirical tools that have been widely used in economics to address these challenges and how they can be adopted by OM researchers. We also present an example that illustrates how the various attributes of big data—variety, velocity, and volume—can be useful in addressing the endogeneity bias.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 509-525 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Manufacturing and Service Operations Management |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 1 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 INFORMS.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
Keywords
- Big data
- Causal inference
- Econometric analysis
- Empirical research