Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive lifestyle politics

Dhavan V. Shah*, Douglas M. McLeod, Eunkyung Kim, Young Lee Sun Young Lee, Melissa R. Gotlieb, Shirley S. Ho, Hilde Breivik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historians and cultural theorists have long asserted that a desire to express political concerns often guides consumer behavior, yet such political consumerism has received limited attention from social scientists. Here, the authors explore the relationship of political consumerism with dispositional factors, communication variables, and consumption orientations using data collected from a panel survey conducted in the United States between February 2002 and July 2005. The authors test a theorized model using both cross-sectional and auto-regressive panel analyses. The static and change models reveal that conventional and online news use encourage political consumerism indirectly through their influence on political talk and environmental concerns. However, media use may also have some suppressive effects by reducing the desire to protect others from harmful messages. Results demonstrate how communication practices and consumption orientations work together to influence political consumerism beyond previously delineated factors. Implications for declines in political and civic participation and youth socialization are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-235
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume611
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Antisweatshop
  • Boycott
  • Buycott
  • Fair trade
  • Lifestyle politics
  • Political consumerism
  • Socially conscious consumption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive lifestyle politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this