Processing Impurities as Phase Assemblage Modifiers in Titanate Nuclear Waste Ceramics

William J. Buykx*, Desmond M. Levins, Roger St C. Smart, Katherine L. Smith, Geoffrey T. Stevens, Kenneth G. Watson, Timothy J. White

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The tolerance of titanate nuclear waste ceramics to fluctuations in the concentrations of processing contaminants was monitored using X‐ray diffraction, electron microscopy, secondary ion mass spectrometry, and analysis of dissolution liquors. Several waste forms were fabricated, all of which contained idealized Purex waste simulant and, in addition, varying quantities of the common waste stream impurities P2O5, MgO, Fe2O3, Na2O, and SiO2. Incorporation of the oxides individually stabilized new phases including monazite (P2O5), pseudobrookite (MgO), loveringite (Fe2O3), freudenbergite (Na2O), and pollucite (SiO2)—only the latter phase deleteriously affected waste form performance by promoting cesium dissolution. However, when the processing contaminants were added simultaneously, a number of synergetic effects, particularly the stabilization of a soluble glassy phase, resulted in elemental losses which were an order of magnitude greater for some matrix and radwaste species. It was found that up to 25 wt% of the idealized Purex waste could be incorporated in the waste without diminution of its properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-225
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Ceramic Society
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1990
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Materials Chemistry

Keywords

  • nuclear waste
  • phases
  • processing
  • titanates
  • waste disposal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Processing Impurities as Phase Assemblage Modifiers in Titanate Nuclear Waste Ceramics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this