TY - JOUR
T1 - Regenerative rehabilitation
T2 - Exploring the synergistic effects of rehabilitation and implantation of a bio-functional scaffold in enhancing nerve regeneration
AU - Lin, Junquan
AU - Anopas, Dollaporn
AU - Milbreta, Ulla
AU - Lin, Po Hen
AU - Chin, Jiah Shin
AU - Zhang, Na
AU - Wee, Seng Kwee
AU - Tow, Adela
AU - Ang, Wei Tech
AU - Chew, Sing Yian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Clinically, rehabilitation is one of the most common treatment options for traumatic injuries. Despite that, recovery remains suboptimal and recent breakthroughs in regenerative approaches may potentially improve clinical outcomes. To date, there have been numerous studies on the utilization of either rehabilitative or regenerative strategies for traumatic injury treatment. However, studies that document the combined effects of rehabilitation and regenerative tissue engineering options remain scarce. Here, in the context of traumatic nerve injury treatment, we use a rat spinal cord injury (SCI) model as a proof of concept to evaluate the synergistic effects of regenerative tissue engineering and rehabilitation. Specifically, we implanted a pro-regenerative hybrid fiber-hydrogel scaffold and subjected SCI rats to intensive rehabilitation. Of note, the rehabilitation session was augmented by a novel customized training device that imparts normal hindlimb gait movements to rats. Morphologically, more regenerated axons were observed when rats received rehabilitation (∼2.5 times and ∼2 times enhancement after 4 and 12 weeks of recovery, respectively, p < 0.05). Besides that, we also observed a higher percentage of anti-inflammatory cells (36.1 ± 12.9% in rehab rats vs. 3.31 ± 1.48% in non-rehab rats, p < 0.05) and perineuronal net formation in rehab rats at Week 4. Physically, rehab animals were also able to exert higher ankle flexion force (∼0.779 N vs. ∼0.495 N at Week 4 and ∼1.36 N vs. ∼0.647 N at Week 12 for rehab vs. non-rehab rats, p < 0.001) and performed better than non-rehab rats in the open field test. Taken together, we conclude that coupling rehabilitation with regenerative scaffold implantation strategies can further promote functional recovery after traumatic nerve injuries.
AB - Clinically, rehabilitation is one of the most common treatment options for traumatic injuries. Despite that, recovery remains suboptimal and recent breakthroughs in regenerative approaches may potentially improve clinical outcomes. To date, there have been numerous studies on the utilization of either rehabilitative or regenerative strategies for traumatic injury treatment. However, studies that document the combined effects of rehabilitation and regenerative tissue engineering options remain scarce. Here, in the context of traumatic nerve injury treatment, we use a rat spinal cord injury (SCI) model as a proof of concept to evaluate the synergistic effects of regenerative tissue engineering and rehabilitation. Specifically, we implanted a pro-regenerative hybrid fiber-hydrogel scaffold and subjected SCI rats to intensive rehabilitation. Of note, the rehabilitation session was augmented by a novel customized training device that imparts normal hindlimb gait movements to rats. Morphologically, more regenerated axons were observed when rats received rehabilitation (∼2.5 times and ∼2 times enhancement after 4 and 12 weeks of recovery, respectively, p < 0.05). Besides that, we also observed a higher percentage of anti-inflammatory cells (36.1 ± 12.9% in rehab rats vs. 3.31 ± 1.48% in non-rehab rats, p < 0.05) and perineuronal net formation in rehab rats at Week 4. Physically, rehab animals were also able to exert higher ankle flexion force (∼0.779 N vs. ∼0.495 N at Week 4 and ∼1.36 N vs. ∼0.647 N at Week 12 for rehab vs. non-rehab rats, p < 0.001) and performed better than non-rehab rats in the open field test. Taken together, we conclude that coupling rehabilitation with regenerative scaffold implantation strategies can further promote functional recovery after traumatic nerve injuries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075323136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075323136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c9bm01095e
DO - 10.1039/c9bm01095e
M3 - Article
C2 - 31580337
AN - SCOPUS:85075323136
SN - 2047-4830
VL - 7
SP - 5150
EP - 5160
JO - Biomaterials Science
JF - Biomaterials Science
IS - 12
ER -