Resisting responsibility for decision-making during medical consultation: A conversation analytic study in Singapore

Ni Eng Lim, Gim Thia Ng, Kang Kwong Luke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) has long been advocated in healthcare. However, the view of medical decision-making as having a paternalistic orientation remains entrenched in clinical practice. Interestingly, such an orientation may also be held by a patient, which may potentially derail the SDM process. Crucially, the SDM process must be jointly negotiated and accomplished by both the patient and the doctor based on a clear division of epistemic and deontic responsibilities. Our analysis reveals a singular practice that is used by elderly Mandarin-speaking patients to deflect responsibility for medical decisions to the doctors. Understandably, the doctors also interactionally demonstrate a reluctance to accept such a responsibility. This discussion brings to light how healthcare ideals may be at odds with the epistemic status and stance of elderly patients in a globalised but culturally rooted Asian country like Singapore.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLanguage, Health and Culture
Subtitle of host publicationProblematizing the Centers and Peripheries of Healthcare Communication Research
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages20-40
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781000890822
ISBN (Print)9780367559632
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Olga Zayts-Spence and Susan M. Bridges.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences
  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resisting responsibility for decision-making during medical consultation: A conversation analytic study in Singapore'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this