Review of experimental studies in social psychology of small groups when an optimal choice exists and application to operating room management decision-making

Andrew Prahl, Franklin Dexter*, Michael T. Braun, Lyn Van Swol

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because operating room (OR) management decisions with optimal choices are made with ubiquitous biases, decisions are improved with decision-support systems. We reviewed experimental social-psychology studies to explore what an OR leader can do when working with stakeholders lacking interest in learning the OR management science but expressing opinions about decisions, nonetheless. We considered shared information to include the rules-of-thumb (heuristics) that make intuitive sense and often seem "close enough" (e.g., staffing is planned based on the average workload). We considered unshared information to include the relevant mathematics (e.g., staffing calculations). Multiple studies have shown that group discussions focus more on shared than unshared information. Quality decisions are more likely when all group participants share knowledge (e.g., have taken a course in OR management science). Several biases in OR management are caused by humans' limited abilities to estimate tails of probability distributions in their heads. Groups are more susceptible to analogous biases than are educated individuals. Since optimal solutions are not demonstrable without groups sharing common language, only with education of most group members can a knowledgeable individual influence the group. The appropriate model of decision-making is autocratic, with information obtained from stakeholders. Although such decisions are good quality, the leaders often are disliked and the decisions considered unjust. In conclusion, leaders will find the most success if they do not bring OR management operational decisions to groups, but instead act autocratically while obtaining necessary information in 1:1 conversations. The only known route for the leader making such decisions to be considered likable and for the decisions to be considered fair is through colleagues and subordinates learning the management science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1221-1229
Number of pages9
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume117
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of experimental studies in social psychology of small groups when an optimal choice exists and application to operating room management decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this