“Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?

Andrew Prahl*, Winnie Wen Pin Goh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) failures are increasingly common as more and more companies race to implement AI solutions. The implementation of AI and its inevitable malfunctions are an unprecedented type of crisis for corporate communication professionals. This study reviews (1) 23 instances of AI failures, (2) subsequent corporate communication, and (3) resultant media coverage to investigate the various strategies employed to deal with AI failures. We also identify if these strategies lead to positive or negative responses and/or mitigation of the crisis. Results show that several response strategies included in extant crisis response frameworks can be effective in dealing with AI crises, whereas other strategies tend to be unsuccessful. Our analysis also points to the emergence of a crisis communication strategy that takes advantage of the uncertainty surrounding the accountability of AI to mitigate the crisis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102077
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Marketing

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Automation
  • Crisis communication
  • Image repair theory
  • Public relations
  • Situational crisis communication theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this