Study protocol: Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: A randomized controlled trial

Thomas R. de Wijkerslooth, Margriet C. de Haan, Esther M. Stoop, Marije Deutekom, Paul Fockens, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Maarten Thomeer, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Marie Louise Essink-Bot, Monique E. van Leerdam, Ernst J. Kuipers, Evelien Dekker*, Jaap Stoker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives.Methods and design: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After providing informed consent, participants will be scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome measure of this study is the participation rate. Secondary outcomes are the diagnostic yield, the expected and perceived burden of the screening test, level of informed choice and cost-effectiveness of both screening methods.Discussion: This study will provide further evidence to enable decision making in population screening for colorectal cancer.Trial registration: Dutch trial register: NTR1829.

Original languageEnglish
Article number47
JournalBMC Gastroenterology
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 19 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol: Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this