Sunk cost fallacy in driving the world's costliest cars

Teck Hua Ho, I. P.L. Png, Sadat Reza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We develop a behavioral model of durable good usage with mental accounting for sunk costs. It predicts higher-than-rational usage that attenuates at a rate that increases with sunk costs. Singapore government policy varied the sunk cost of buying a new car. Using Singapore data, we estimate the elasticity of driving with respect to sunk costs to be 0.048, which implies that government policy between 2009 and 2013 was associated with 86 kilometers per month, or 5.6%, more driving. The results are robust to specifying sunk costs as relative to buyer income and estimation with Hong Kong data. We believe this to be the first field evidence of the sunk cost fallacy in usage of a major durable good.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1761-1778
Number of pages18
JournalManagement Science
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 INFORMS.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Keywords

  • Behavioral economics
  • Consumer choice
  • Durable goods
  • Mental accounting
  • Sunk costs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sunk cost fallacy in driving the world's costliest cars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this