Abstract
Comparing the overpotential required to reach the current density of −2 10 mA cmgeo (per geometric area of an electrode) (η@10 mA cm−2geo) is a popular method of ranking electrocatalysts for water-splitting reactions, i.e., the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). However, such methodology is, in essence, not reasonable for studying the intrinsic chemistry difference of electrocatalysts. To have a rational understanding of η@ 10 mA cm−2geo, here, its historical origin and its limitations on reflecting the intrinsic electrocatalytic activity are discussed. The η@ 10 mA cm −2geo is a valid practical parameter to assess water-splitting devices, but it cannot determine whether a particular electrocatalyst is intrinsically active or not.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1800168 |
Journal | Small Methods |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 13 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Chemistry
- General Materials Science
Keywords
- 10 mA cm−
- electrochemical water splitting
- intrinsic activity