Abstract
Since Chen (2013), a fast-growing body of literature has documented abundant supporting evidence for the linguistic-savings hypothesis. Despite this influx of research, direct causal evidence is limited. In this study, we take advantage of a unique linguistic feature of the Chinese language: speakers can freely choose whether or not to use the future tense when referring to a future event. This flexibility allows us to unobtrusively manipulate the use of “will” in the description of the rewards in a standard time preference task to cleanly examine its effect on intertemporal decisions. However, our results do not lend further empirical support for the linguistic-savings hypothesis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103307 |
Journal | European Economic Review |
Volume | 120 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Future tense
- Languages
- Linguistic-savings hypothesis
- Time preference