Abstract
The study found that encountering new information in an online chat rather than information that participants already knew and were familiar with was more likely to reduce support for the view that climate change is due to anthropogenic causes, even though the majority of the presented information supported anthropogenic causes. Participants reported feeling more competent and knowledgeable about the topic and felt less ostracized from others in the chat when participants were already familiar with information others discussed than when information discussed by others in the chat was new information. However, they viewed other chat members as more competent and knowledgeable when those others mentioned new information. Results are discussed within knowledge deficit model of science communication and the bias for common information.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1128-1142 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Environmental Communication |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 17 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Keywords
- climate change
- Common information bias
- knowledge deficit model
- mutual enhancement
- science communication