The Effects of Discussion of Familiar or Non-Familiar Information on Opinions of Anthropogenic Climate Change

Lyn M. Van Swol*, Andrew Prahl, Miranda Kolb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study found that encountering new information in an online chat rather than information that participants already knew and were familiar with was more likely to reduce support for the view that climate change is due to anthropogenic causes, even though the majority of the presented information supported anthropogenic causes. Participants reported feeling more competent and knowledgeable about the topic and felt less ostracized from others in the chat when participants were already familiar with information others discussed than when information discussed by others in the chat was new information. However, they viewed other chat members as more competent and knowledgeable when those others mentioned new information. Results are discussed within knowledge deficit model of science communication and the bias for common information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1128-1142
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Communication
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 17 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Keywords

  • climate change
  • Common information bias
  • knowledge deficit model
  • mutual enhancement
  • science communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effects of Discussion of Familiar or Non-Familiar Information on Opinions of Anthropogenic Climate Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this