The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: A comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments

Jerome Sint Nicolaas*, Vincent de Jonge, Robert A. de Man, Frank ter Borg, Djuna L. Cahen, Willem Moolenaar, Mark F.J. Stolk, Antonie J.P. van Tilburg, Roland M. Valori, Monique E. van Leerdam, Ernst J. Kuipers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Global Rating Scale is an endoscopy quality assurance programme, successfully implemented in England. It remains uncertain whether it is applicable in another health care setting. Aim: To assess the applicability of the Global Rating Scale as benchmark tool in an international context. Methods: Eleven Dutch endoscopy departments were included for a Global Rating Scale-census, performed as a cross-sectional evaluation, July 2010. Two Global Rating Scale-dimensions - 'clinical quality' and 'patient experience' - were assessed across six items using a range of levels: from level-D (basic) to level-A (excellent). Construct validity was assessed by comparing department-specific colonoscopy audit data to GRS-levels. Results: For 'clinical quality', variable scores were achieved in items '. safety' (9%=B, 27%=C, 64%=D) and '. communication' (46% = A, 18% = C, 36% = D). All departments achieved a basic score in '. quality' (100% = D). For 'patient experience', variable scores were achieved in '. timeliness' (18% = A, 9% = B, 73% = D) and '. booking-choice' (36% = B, 46% = C, 18% = D). All departments achieved basic scores in '. equality' (100% = D). Departments obtaining level-C or above in '. information', '. comfort', '. communication', '. timeliness' and '. aftercare', achieved significantly better audit outcomes compared to those obtaining level-D (p<0.05). Conclusion: The Global Rating Scale is appropriate to use outside England. There was significant variance across departments in dimensions. Most Global Rating Scale-levels were in line with departments' audit outcomes, indicating construct validity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)919-924
Number of pages6
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Keywords

  • Benchmark
  • Checklist
  • Endoscopy
  • Global Rating Scale
  • Quality assurance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: A comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this