The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate

Elaine W.J. Ng*, Benjamin H. Detenber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using a mixed-model factorial design, a laboratory experiment (n=153) was conducted to investigate the effects of two features of CMC-synchronicity and civility-on perceptions of online political discussions and discussants. Results indicate that the synchronous versions of the discussions were perceived as more informative and persuasive than the asynchronous versions. Discussants in the uncivil versions of the discussions were perceived as more dominant and less credible. However, neither synchronicity nor civility had a significant impact on people's intentions to participate. The results stand in contrast to those of previous content analysis research, suggesting the importance of studying perceptions in future research. The implications of the findings for online political communication are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this