Topical fundus pulsation measurements in age-related macular degeneration

Leopold Schmetterer*, Andreas Kruger, Oliver Findl, Helene Breiteneder, Hans Georg Eichler, Michael Wolzt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to investigate regional fundus pulsations in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients with subretinal neovascular membranes. Methods: Local fundus pulsation amplitudes (FPAs) were measured in 12 patients with AMD with classic neovascular membranes. Measurements were performed directly on the membrane and adjacent to the membrane, FPAs were assessed with a recently developed laser interferometric method. FPA measurements were performed in 12 healthy subjects at similar posterior pole locations. Results: In AMD patients FPAs were consistently lower when measured directly on the neovascular membrane ('inside') than at measurement sites around the membrane ('outside'), The difference in FPA was 26 ± 3% (mean ± SEM, range 13-40%, P < 0.0001). In healthy subjects, however, FPAs were significantly higher at the measurement points corresponding to 'inside' points (15 ± 4%, P < 0.0006). Conclusions: We have shown that FPAs are reduced at classic neovascular membranes in patients with AMD. The mechanism behind this finding remains unclear. Hence, future studies have to ascertain whether this observation is associated with changes in fundus layers or with local choroidal perfusion abnormalities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-163
Number of pages4
JournalGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Volume236
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Topical fundus pulsation measurements in age-related macular degeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this