Use of the jackknife statistic to evaluate result replicability

Rebecca P. Ang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Result replicability has often been confused with significance testing because of a misinformed view that statistical significance evaluates result importance and result replicability. Several alternatives, of which the jackknife statistic is one, provide researchers with the tools for estimating result replicability. In the present study, an available data set from A. L. Edwards (1985, p. 57) is used to illustrate the use of the jackknife statistic to assess the replicability of multiple regression results in a concrete fashion. The jackknifed coefficients are computed to assess the stability of beta weights and the multiple R2 value. Confidence intervals and t statistics are also calculated to facilitate the interpretation of these jackknifed coefficients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-228
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of General Psychology
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of the jackknife statistic to evaluate result replicability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this