Abstract
Eighty-seven years ago, Köhler reported that the majority of students picked the same answer in a quiz: Which novel word form (‘maluma’ or ‘takete’) went best with which abstract line drawing (one curved, one angular). Others have consistently shown the effect in a variety of contexts, with only one reported failure by Rogers and Ross. In the spirit of transparency, we report our own failure in the same journal. In our study, speakers of Syuba, from the Himalaya in Nepal, do not show a preference when matching word forms ‘kiki’ and ‘bubu’ to spiky versus curvy shapes. We conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies to investigate the relationship between pseudoword legality and task effects. Our combined analyses suggest a common source for both of the failures: ‘wordiness’ – We believe these tests fail when the test words do not behave according to the sound structure of the target language.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | i-Perception |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 1 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2017.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Ophthalmology
- Sensory Systems
- Artificial Intelligence
Keywords
- cross-cultural perception
- cross-modal congruence
- language-specific perception
- pseudoword legality
- sound symbolism