Why breast cancer signatures are no better than random signatures explained

Wilson Wen Bin Goh*, Limsoon Wong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Random signature superiority (RSS) occurs when random gene signatures outperform published and/or known signatures. Unlike reproducibility and generalizability issues, RSS is relatively underexplored. Yet, understanding it is imperative for better analytical outcome. In breast cancer, RSS correlates strongly with enrichment for proliferation genes and signature size. Removal of proliferation genes from random signatures reduces the predictive power of random signatures. Almost all genes are correlated to a certain extent with the proliferation signature, making complete elimination of its confounding effects impossible. RSS goes beyond breast cancer, because it also exists in other diseases; it is especially strong in other cancers in a platform-independent manner, and less severe, but present nonetheless, in nonproliferative diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1818-1823
Number of pages6
JournalDrug Discovery Today
Volume23
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Drug Discovery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why breast cancer signatures are no better than random signatures explained'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this