Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting

Boon Seng Tan*, Kin Yew Low

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite its increasing popularity, no official guidance on the financial reporting of Bitcoin transactions has been provided by standard setters, although tax accounting guidance began to appear in 2014. Designed as a decentralised currency, Bitcoin is not intended to become a reporting currency and will instead complement fiat money. We argue that in the case of Bitcoin the accounting principle of faithful representation requires interpretation of the economic substance for financial reporting that varies with reporting entity: trading firms recognise Bitcoin like a foreign currency and measure the revenue, or expense, at the equivalent amount of the reporting currency and digital currency exchanges recognise Bitcoin as goods in line with tax accounting treatment. An Economica paper by Radford (1945), which describes the use of cigarettes as commodity money in a prisoner of war camp alludes to this economic basis. This paper applies accounting principles to a practical issue and contributes to the process by which standard setters may issue an interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian Accounting Review
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 CPA Australia

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this