Co-creating consumer logistics from self-collection to crowd-sourced delivery: An examination on contextual differences in last-mile

Xueqin Wang, Yiik Diew Wong, Tianyi Chen, Kum Fai Yuen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines consumers’ willingness to co-create last-mile logistics, focusing on (1) the motivational effects of empowerment and shared responsibility perceptions and (2) the moderating effects of private-social and paid-unpaid contexts. A sociological view of consumer labour is integrated into the value co-creation literature to develop a conceptual framework. A survey is used for data collection utilising a scenario-based within-subject design. We found that consumers are motivated by the seemingly paradoxical needs for both empowerment and shared responsibility when collaborating with logistics operators, with the individualising motive as the mediator. Furthermore, consumers’ co-creation patterns are context dependent. While the empowerment perception is the dominant motivator in private logistics contexts (e.g., self-collection), its salience is suppressed in social settings (e.g., crowd-sourced delivery), giving rise to the shared responsibility perception as the more influential motivator. Our analysis also revealed that the private-social contextual moderating effect is hinged upon the presence of monetary rewards.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114136
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume168
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Marketing

Keywords

  • Consumer logistics
  • Crowd-sourced delivery
  • Individualising motive
  • Last-mile logistics
  • Self-collection
  • Value co-creation
  • Working consumer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Co-creating consumer logistics from self-collection to crowd-sourced delivery: An examination on contextual differences in last-mile'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this