Gap acceptance of violators at signalised pedestrian crossings

P. P. Koh*, Y. D. Wong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gap acceptance of violating pedestrians was studied at seven stretches of signalised pedestrian crossings in Singapore. The provision of the traffic light signals provide a 'safer' crossing option to these pedestrians, as compared to uncontrolled crossings and mid-block arterial roads. However, there are still people choosing to cross at the riskier period (Red Man phase). The paper discusses about the size of traffic gaps rejected and accepted by pedestrians and the behaviour of riskier pedestrians (those adapting partial gap). The likelihood of pedestrians accepting gaps between vehicular traffic as a combination of different influencing independent variables such as traffic, environmental and personal factors was studied and modelled using logistic regression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-185
Number of pages8
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume62
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Law

Keywords

  • Gap acceptance
  • Signalised pedestrian crossing
  • Violators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gap acceptance of violators at signalised pedestrian crossings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this