The new CPF Life plans as portfolios

Boon Seng Tan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examined the new CPF Life plans - the standard (default) and basic plans - as portfolios of a bond and an obligation to purchase an annuity. This perspective, in contrast to the view that these plans are just annuities, shows that the mandatory scheme does not have universal coverage even for those who are mandated into the scheme, and there are subtle cross subsidies among groups. The basic plan offers real choice for CPF members to substantially reduce further annuitisation by reducing the annuity component of the portfolio and exiting the plan because of the long vesting age. We estimated the money's worth ratio (MWR) of the plans and found that they were not sustainable at the current payouts (1.14 < MWR < 1.93) consistent with previous estimation of earlier plans replaced by the current ones. We predict the payouts will trend downwards after 2023 (the years the first cohort's annuity plans are executed) because the generous MWR are not sustainable. This paper contributes to policy debate about the coverage of the mandatory scheme and the wealth transfer between the insurer and annuitants. Policy questions about wealth transfer among annuitants, and the welfare effect of introducing the scheme, require further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-116
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Public Policy
Volume13
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations

Keywords

  • CPF Life
  • Money's worth ratio
  • MWR; portfolio
  • Wealth transfer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The new CPF Life plans as portfolios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this