The racial politics of resurrection in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world

Christopher Trigg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay examines the impact of the eighteenth century's developing rhetoric of racial difference on Protestant attitudes toward the religious salvation of Africans across the Atlantic world. As English colonies passed legislation that widened the legal and social gap between blacks and whites, missionaries and theologians called for more robust and wide-ranging efforts to evangelize African men and women. I show how speculation into the fate of bodies of color in the afterlife helped some Protestant authors navigate this apparently contradictory situation. Reading the work of two Massachusetts puritans (Samuel Sewall and Cotton Mather), and one Connecticut Anglican associated with the English Society for the Propagation of the Gospel (John Beach), I demonstrate that the fine details of these writers' eschatological and millennial schemes often belied their overt insistence that ethnic distinctions would be entirely transcended in the world to come. Each suggested, in his own way, that it was impossible to imagine that a resurrected body could be black, thereby underlining the subordinate status of Christians of color during mortal life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-84
Number of pages38
JournalEarly American Literature
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 University of North Carolina Press. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Keywords

  • African Americans
  • Afterlife
  • Cotton Mather
  • Millennialism
  • Religious conversion
  • Resurrection
  • Samuel Sewall
  • Slavery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The racial politics of resurrection in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this